| . |
Armenian music &
musicians
he
Armenians have a wonderful melodic genius: the beauty of their tunes matches
fully the best Gregorian and Synagogue examples, and excels the Byzantine
chant." This is how Eric Werner, the American musicologist, assessed the
significance of Armenian liturgical music in his book "The Sacred Bridge".
The
beginnings of Armenian music are buried in antiquity. Nevertheless, we
know that music accompanied other early forms of artistic expression, such
as poetry, pagan rites, historic drama and pantomimes. Most Armenian music
makers were career musicians, full-time professionals, who composed melodies
and disseminated them among the people. The vipasan (rhapsodist)
improvised music that was most primitive in character. Another type of
career musician, the kousan (minstrel) appeared during the
pre-literate era and initially entertained at royal banquets and other
formal occasions. The most significant of the professional musicians was
the ashough (troubadour); in addition to composing music
and poetry, he sang and accompanied himself on a musical instrument, usually
the kemantche - a bowed string instrument. The best-known Armenian troubadour
was Sayat Nova (1717-1795), an extraordinary musician, as well as
a humanist and patriot. His melodies are elaborate yet structurally lucid,
highly original yet very singable, and rhythmically taut yet packed with
expression.
The origin of Armenian church music
may be traced back to the 5th century. Nurtured by the melodies of pre-Christian
Armenia, and the secular songs of everyday life, it developed into a unique
manifestation of the Armenian faith, mind and soul.
The earliest musical expression of
worship was the chanting of psalms. Little more at first
than slight intonation of the text, this chanting later developed into
a form displaying a clear melodic line; typically it included a particularly
expressive pattern of embellishment, or melisma, in which one syllable
of a word would be sung to an extended melody.
In addition to the psalm, another
type of liturgical chant, the sharakan, emerged. The sharakan
is the most sublime and enduring evidence of Armenian hymnography. Stylistically
there are two distinct styles of sharakan; the earlier one in which the
text is sung with the same music for each successive stanza, and the later
one whose text follows each specific verse. The number of sharakan in the
Armenian liturgy was increased considerably by Nerses Shnorhali (the
Gracious) (1102-1173), a notable musician and theoretician, as well
as a humanitarian and a reformer.
Structurally
the melodies of Armenian sacred music depend on a method of modal classification,
which is a system of octoechoes. Each of the eight modes in the octoechoes
provided a specific frame of reference with certain melodic designs, rhythmic
patterns and ornamentation which the perform-musician used as a model for
the creation of new melodies. The music was notated in ekphonetic signs,
symbols indicating relative movement of pitch. They first appeared in Armenian
manuscripts of the 8th century and developed during the 13th century into
a highly complex system of symbols called manrusoum. However, as a result
of deteriorating socio-political conditions in Armenia, this style of notation
eventually fell into disuse and finally became unintelligible. Despite
exhaustive research, the meaning of these signs remains essentially unclear.
Among more recent Armenian musicians,
Komidas (1869-1935), a clergyman,
stands alone. He collected nearly 3.000 folk songs, presented important
papers and contributed articles of great ethnomusicological interest. He
revived the national music, both sacred and secular, purified it from years
of acculturation, and restored to it the dignity it deserves. Through his
efforts, Armenians again took pride in their cultural heritage, salvaged
their national legacy from total destruction, and regained their musical
identity.
|
. |