| . |
The Young Turk dictatorship
isillusion
weighed heavily on the Armenians after the calamities of 1894-1896, yet
some comfort was found in the fact that various non-Armenian elements were
also trying to organise against the Sultan's tyranny. Several of these
groups merged into the Committee of Union of Progress, popularly referred
to as the Young Turks. In 1908 a military coup led by the Young Turks forced
Sultan Abdul-Hamid to become a constitutional monarch. The Armenians hailed
the victory of the Young Turks amid manifestations of Christian and Muslim
brotherhood.
From
1908-1914 the seemingly egalitarian Young Turk became xenophobic nationalist
bent on creating a new order and eliminating the Armenian Question by eliminating
the Armenian people. European exploitation of the Turkish weaknesses after
the 1908 revolution and the Turkish loss of more territory in the Balkans
contributed to this process. In 1909 more than 20,000 Armenians were massacred
in the region of Cilicia. The Young Turks blamed Abdul-Hamid and deposed
him, but there were strong indications that adherents of the Young Turks
themselves participated in the carnage. The crisis prompted the Young Turks
to declare a state of siege and suspend constitutional rights for several
years.
It was during this period that the
concept of "Turkism" and exclusive nationalism attracted several prominent
Young Turks, who began to envisage a new, homogenous Turkish state in place
of the enervated and exploited multinational Ottoman Empire. With the ideology
of Turkism expounded by such writers as Zia Gokalp, the Young Turk extremists
began to contemplate ways to abandon multinational "Ottomanism" for exclusive
"Turkism" and so transform the Ottoman Empire into a homogenous Turkish
domain.
In a study on the development of
Turkish nationalism, Uriel Heyd notes that in "relacing the belief in God
by the belief in nation," for Gokalp, "nationalism had become a religion."
Regarding the nation, Gokalp wrote:
I am a soldier; it is my
commander
I obey without question all its
orders
With closed eyes I carry out my
duty.
Professor Robert Melson has summarised
this attitude: "Simply put, the good of the nation and for its sake all
is permissible". Despite the ominous circumstances, Armenian leaders continued
to hope that satisfactory reforms and equality could be achieved within
the structure of the Ottoman Empire.
The
outbreak of World War I in 1914 deeply alarmed the Armenians. If the Ottoman
Empire entered the conflict on the side of Germany, the Armenian plateau
would be would become the inevitable theatre of another Russo-Turkish war.
In view of the fact that the Armenian homelands lay on both sides of the
frontier, the Armenians would suffer severely no matter who might eventually
win the war. For these reasons, Armenian spokesperson implored the Young
Turk leaders to maintain neutrality and spare the Empire from disaster.
Despite these appeals, the Germanophile Young Turks faction, led by the
Minister of War Enver Pasha, and Minister of Internal Affairs Talaat Pasha
sealed a secret alliance with Berlin and in return for joining the war
against Great Britain, France and Russia, looked to the creation of new
Turkish realm extending into Central Asia. The Armenians were now seen
as an obstacle to the realisation to that goal. Turkism was to supplant
Ottomanism and give purpose and justification to unlimited violence for
the greater good of producing a homogenous state and society. In Accounting
for Genocide, Helen Fein concluded:
The victims of twentieth
century premeditated genocide - the Jews, the Gypsies, the Armenians -
were murdered in order to fulfil the state's design for a new order . .
. War was used in both cases . . . to transform the nation to correspond
to the ruling elite's formula by eliminating the groups conceived as alien,
enemies by the definition.
The
genocidal process
n
the night of 23-24 April, 1915, Armenian political, religious, educational,
and intellectual leaders in Constantinople (Istanbul) were arrested, deported
into Anatolia, and put to death. In May, after mass deportations had already
begun, Minister of Internal Affairs Talaat Pasha, claiming that the Armenians
were untrustworthy, could offer aid and comfort to the enemy, and were
in a state of imminent rebellion, ordered ex post facto their deportation
from the war zones to relocation centres - actually barren deserts of Syria
and Mesapotamia. The Armenians were driven out, not only from areas near
war zones but from the length and breadth of the Empire, except in Constantinople
and Smyrna, where numerous foreign merchants were located.
Sometimes Armenian Catholics and
Protestants were exempted from the deportation decrees, only to follow
once the majority belonging to the Armenian Apostolic Church had been dispatched.
Secrecy, surprise, and deception were all part of the process.
The
whole of Asia Minor was put in motion. Armenian serving in the Ottoman
armies had already been segregated into unarmed labour battalions and were
now taken out in batches and murdered. Of the remaining population, the
adult and teenage males, as a pattern, swiftly, separated from the deportation
caravans and killed outright under the directions of the Young Turk agents,
the gendarmerie, and bandits prepared for the operation. Women and children
were driven for months over mountains and deserts. Intentionally deprived
of food and water, they fell by the thousands and the hundreds of thousands
along the routes to the desert. In this manner, the Armenian people were
effectively eliminated from their homeland of several millennia. Of the
refugee survivors scattered throughout the Arab provinces and the Caucuses,
thousands more were to die of starvation, epidemic and exposure. Even the
memory of the nation was intended for obliteration, as churches and cultural
monuments were desecrated and small children, snatched from their parents,
were renamed and given out to be raised as non-Armenians and non-Christians.
The following excerpt from a report
by the Italian consul-general at Trebizond typifies the hundreds of eyewitness
accounts by foreign officials:
The passing of gangs
of Armenian exiles beneath the windows and before the door of the Consulate;
their prayers for help, when neither I nor any other could do anything
to answer them; the city in a state of siege, guarded at every point by
15,000 troops in complete war equipment, by thousands of police agents,
by bands of volunteers, and by the members of the Committee of Union and
Progress; the lamentations, the tears, the abandonments, the imprecations,
the many suicides, the instantaneous deaths from sheer terror; the sudden
unhinging of mens' reason; the conflagration; the shooting of victims in
the city; the ruthless searches through the houses and in the countryside;
the hundreds of corpses found every day along the exile road; the young
women converted by force to Moslem families; or else placed by the hundreds
on board ships in nothing but shirts, and then capsizes and drowned in
the Black Sea and the River Deyirmen Dere - these are my last ineffaceable
memories of Trebizond, memories which still, at a month's distance torment
my soul and almost drive me frantic.
Henry Morgenthau, the American
Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire at the time, tried to reason with the
Young Turk leaders and to alert the United States and world to the tragic
events, but, except for some donations for relief efforts, his actions
were in vain. His description of the genocide begins:
The Central Government
now announced its intention of gathering the two million or more Armenians
living in the several sections of the Empire and transporting them to this
desolate and inhospitable region. Had they undertaken such a deportation
in good faith, it would have represented the height of cruelty and inj
ustice. As a matter of fact, the Turks never had the slightest idea of
re-establishing the Annenians in this new country . . . The real purpose
of the deportation was robbery and destruction; it really represented a
new method of massacre. When the Turkish authorities gave the orders for
these deportations, they were merely giving the death warrant to the whole
race; they understood this well, and, in their conversations with me, they
made no particular attempt to conceal the fact.
Ambassador Morgenthau concluded:
I am confident that whole
history of the human race contains no terrible episode as this.
Estimates
of the Armenian dead vary from 600,000 to two million. A United Nations
Humans Rights Sub-Commission report in 1985 gives the figure of "at least
one million," but the important point in understanding a tragedy such as
this is not the exact and precise count of the number who died - that will
never be known - but the fact that more than half the Armenian race perished
and the rest were forcibly driven from their ancestral homeland. Another
important point is that what befell the Armenians was by the will of the
government. While a large segment of the general population participated
in the looting and massacres, many Muslim leaders were shocked by what
was happening, and thousands of Armenian women and children were rescued
and sheltered by compassionate individual Turks, Kurds and Arabs.
Although the genocide committed by
the Ottoman Young Turks and the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Gennany each
had particular and unique features, there were some striking parallels.
The similarities include the perpetration of genocide under the cover of
major international conflict, thus minimising the possibility of external
intervention; conception of the plan by a monolithic and xenophobic clique;
espousal of an ideology giving purpose and justification to racism, exclusivism,
and intolerance towards elements resisting or deemed unworthy of assimilation;
imposition of strict party discipline and secrecy during the period of
preparation; formulation of extra-legal special armed forces to ensure
the rigorous execution of the operation; provocation of public hostility
towards the victim group and ascribing to it the very excesses to which
it would be subjected.
|
. |